One of the things I found most interesting about the Wolcott reading was his citing of Norman Mailer. Interesting because, as I was reading the article, it seemed to me that there was not such a wide gulf separating Wolcott’s work from documentary or journalism. So, what is it that makes an inquiry an example of research rather than reportage? Is it the structure? A more deliberate, conscious and explicit application of methodology?
I’m not sure I’m entirely comfortable with that explanation. I might be, though.
To me, right now, good research begins with an intent – stated or implied – to shed light on a question, a problem, a phenomenon.
I can agree with Hostetler that good research should connect to some sound and justifiable conception of wellbeing. And if that is the case, it seems to me that the research must be methodologically sound, and that the researcher must also at least contemplate the means by which her work will communicate with individuals outside the research community.
Jennifer Torres Siders 
I appreciate you candor when trying to define good research. I thought I knew what the definition was but now realize my view was too narrow. When thinking about good research in education, I agree there needs to be connection to human well-being. Why would we do research on an educational topic that did not have this connection?
To me, the articles all point to the universal consensus that there are many varied definitions for good research. The more we review different articles the more I agree that well being and do no harm should be in the forefront of the researcher’s mind. Hostetler gave a good beginning point for a working definition that is growing for me daily.